Road Safety
- Overview
- PRODUCTS
- Asset management
- Conspicuity markings
- Pavement markings & accessories
- Reflective sheeting
- Reflective panels
- Films & overlays
- Inks & additives
- View all products
- APPLICATIONS
- Roads & highways
- Complete streets
- School zones
- Traffic control
- Traffic sign manufacturing
- Vehicle visibility
- RESOURCES
- Safety initiatives & funding
- Road safety blog
- Conspicuity tape distributors
- Digital sign fabricator locator
- Traffic sign printing warranties
- SUPPORT
FHWA minimum levels of retroreflectivity ruling (last revised June 2012)
- The compliance date to implement and use an assessment or management method designed to maintain regulatory and warning sign retroreflectivity at or above the established minimum levels is June 13, 2014.
- The compliance date for replacement of signs identified as not meeting minimum retroreflectivity levels has been eliminated; however, elimination of the compliance date does not eliminate the regulatory requirement to comply with the MUTCD Standard. Even without a specific date, agencies still need to replace signs they identify as not meeting the established minimum retroreflectivity levels. According to the FHWA:
- Signs identified through an agency‘s method as below the minimum established retroreflectivity levels have exhausted their useful service life and need to be replaced because they do not meet the needed function of being adequately visible at night. Similar to other occurrences of signs that are no longer serviceable, agencies are expected to prioritize replacement of these signs based on engineering considerations such as the relative importance of the sign to the safety of the road user, volumes and speed of nighttime traffic, and optimal use of limited resources, among others. Signs that are no longer serviceable might demand a higher priority for replacement over other non-compliant signs that are replaced by systematic upgrading or routine maintenance schedules.
- While minimum performance levels still exist for guide and street name signs, these types of signs are excluded from the assessment/management method compliance date. The final rule states that "types of signs other than regulatory or warning are to be added to an agency’s management or assessment method as resources allow."
- The final rule adds a new Option statement exempting existing historic street name signs within a locally identified historic district from the Standards regarding color, letter size, and other design features, including retroreflectivity.
Summary of the minimum maintained retroreflectivity levels table
- White copy on overhead guide signs must be made from prismatic sheeting.
- White copy on ground mounted street name signs cannot be made from Type I sheeting.
- Warning signs (black on yellow or orange) cannot be made from Type I sheeting.
- Regulatory signs (black on white) must retain a minimum retroreflectivity level of ≥ 50 cd/lx/m² (while use of Type I sheeting—with an initial retroreflectivity value of 70 cd/lx/m²--is allowed, sign life will be short and may result in poor life cycle value).
- Warning signs (black on yellow or orange) cannot be made from Type I sheeting.
Summary of assessment/management methods
Related to minimum levels of reflectivity
-
3M products that meet minimum levels of retroreflectivity
-
Compare reflective sheeting
-
3M applications
Stay informed with 3M Road Safety
Subscribe to receive transportation safety emails and stay up-to-date on the latest events, news and promotions for the transportation safety industry.
Close
Our apologies...
An error has occurred while submitting. Please try again later...
Thank you!
Your form was submitted successfully
