1. United States
  2. All 3M Products
  3. Medical
  4. Bandages & Dressings
  5. Skin Closures
  6. 3M™ Steri-Strip™ Reinforced Adhesive Skin Closures

3M™ Steri-Strip™ Reinforced Adhesive Skin Closures

3M ID 70200711185UPC 30707387371303
  • Strength - Nonwoven rayon backed material reinforced with filaments for strength. (Reference on file)
  • Cost savings - A low cost alternative to sutures and tissue adhesives1
  • Easy on patients - Soft, nonwoven backing and breathable design.
 More...
View all details
Specifications
Attribute Name
Value
Adhesive Type
Acrylate
Brand
Steri-Strip™
Cladimed Code
F52BC01
Color Family
White
Condition
Skin Closure, Wound Care
Latex
No
Overall Length (Imperial)
2 in
Overall Length (Metric)
50 mm
Overall Width (Imperial)
0.5 in
Overall Width (Metric)
12 mm
Product Color
White
Product Type
Skin Closures
Size
1/2 inch x 2 inch (12mm x 50mm)
Skin Closure Condition Type
Skin Laceration
Therapeutic Area and Conditions
Reinforced Skin Closure Strips
Units per Pack
50
Details
  • Strength - Nonwoven rayon backed material reinforced with filaments for strength. (Reference on file)
  • Cost savings - A low cost alternative to sutures and tissue adhesives1
  • Easy on patients - Soft, nonwoven backing and breathable design.

3M™ Steri-Strip™ Reinforced Adhesive Skin Closures are the standard in adhesive skin closures, trusted for their convenience, simplicity and non-invasive design.

A sterile, breathable adhesive strip reinforced with polymer filaments, for strong, reliable closure of incisions and skin lacerations.

Suggested Applications

  • Known for their versatility, Steri-Strip Reinforced Skin Closures are used in the closure of lacerations, surgical incisions and following early suture/staple removal.
  • For use in: emergency department, operating room, clinics and physician's offices, and same day surgery centers
  • Reference:

    1. Zempsky WT, Zehrer CL, Lyle CT,Hedblom EC. Economic comparison of methods of woundclosure: Wound closure strips vs. sutures and woundadhesives. International wound journal. 2005;2:272-281