Accurate bracket placement is fundamental to achieve a beautiful result in a short time. Research has shown 3D printed bonding trays to accurately reproduce virtual bracket positioning done on digital models¹. This method provides confidence that brackets will be positioned on the patient’s teeth as intended to achieve treatment goals¹. It also helps ensure that finishing procedures are simpler and faster. In this case, Digital Flash-Free Bonding was performed by positioning brackets on digital models using Ortho Analyzer™ (3Shape) software and then by 3D-printing a bonding transfer tray with bracket wells.
3M™ APC™ Flash-Free Adhesive Coated Brackets were loaded into the tray on the day of bonding and kept in a light-proof box until the bonding appointment time. 3M™ Clarity™ Ultra Self-Ligating Brackets with 3M™ Unitek™ Lateral Development Archwires permitted first phase application of light forces in order to orthodontically develop both the upper arch and, to a lesser extent, the lower arch (uprighting movement).
Nevertheless, in the second phase of treatment, with Beta-Titanium and Stainless Steel archwires it was possible to perfectly control of the final tooth position. Aesthetics has become very important nowadays and with Clarity Ultra Brackets it was possible to satisfy the patient’s aesthetic request without renouncing the advantages of a self-ligating appliance.
The patient’s chief concerns were smile aesthetics and alignment of the anterior frontal teeth. In order to improve the final result and accelerate treatment by reducing the duration of the finishing procedure, we decided to use a digital bonding technique. Using this technique, bracket positioning is more accurate and it is possible to previsualize the final result.¹ The software provides the orthodontist with much information about the final occlusion obtainable and the aesthetic outcome. It is possible to introduce all of the overcorrections needed to obtain the best result for each patient by evaluating both Bolton discrepancies and anatomical variations in tooth morphology.²
It is also possible to carefully plan the movement of each single tooth from its initial position to its final planned position. We decided to use Clarity Ultra Brackets in both arches to satisfy the patient's aesthetic request while maintaining the high versatility of a fixed self-ligating appliance system.
Fig. 4-5, Software views of teeth, brackets, and positioning.
We planned to open the bite principally through lower incisor absolute intrusion, avoiding premolar and molar extrusion, in order not to rotate the mandible in a clock-wise direction. Reducing profile convexity and increasing chin projection were necessary to improve the facial appearance of this patient. For this reason, we chose a self-ligating appliance (light forces) and we planned to build occlusal build-ups only on posterior teeth. We decided, in agreement with the patient, to correct the dental Class II by using light Class II elastics. Taking into account the patient’s favorable growth pattern, we planned to accurately control the vertical dimension by limiting posterior dental extrusion in order to allow a favorable sagittal growth response.³
- Archwire progression in the upper arch:
- Archwire progression in the lower arch:
- Upper occlusal build-ups on molars and first premolars and lower occlusal build-ups on first premolars were built to control molar and premolar vertical position during the lower incisor intrusion phase and to promote Class II occlusal correction.⁴
- Class II elastics (Size 3/16 in. - Force Rating Light 3.5 oz.) were used for 7 months, 14 hours per day, to center upper and lower midlines and to correct the Class II molar and canine relationship. The light force was necessary to limit posterior extrusion.
Fig. 9, A-E, Class II elastics and occlusal build-ups
- Intercuspation elastics (Size 1/8 in. - Force Rating Light 3 oz.) were used for 1 month, 14 hours per day, to improve occlusion in the left side and to parallelize upper and lower arches (in the lower arch we used a sectional from 3 to 3).
Fig. 11, A-D, Intercuspation and sectional 3-3 in the lower arch.
Active treatment time was 10 months. No brackets were inadvertently debonded. Ideal occlusion ⁵,⁶ was achieved and the deep bite was corrected. ANB decreased by 2° improving lip fullness and profile appearance. Upper occlusal plane was parallel to the pupillary line. Negative buccal corridors were reduced
Fig. 13-14, Table 2, Final panoramic and cephalometric x-ray analysis.
The most significant results in this case were the improvement in smile aesthetics and the complete Class II correction in a short treatment time. Accurate orthodontic planning aided by the use of digital bonding software was of great help in obtaining the final result.
Precise control of the final tooth position was obtained with accurate positioning of Clarity Ultra Ceramic Brackets. This appliance also provided great torque and rotation control. Hi-tech Lateral Development archwires permitted application of light forces during the arch development phase and Beta III Titanium archwires were of great help in the final detailing. The patient was very satisfied with both the aesthetics of the orthodontic appliance used and the final result of treatment.
References
1 Duarte MEA, Gribel BF, Spitz A, Artese F, Miguel JA. Reproducibility of digital indirect bonding technique using three-dimensional (3D) models and 3D-printed transfer trays. Angle Orthod 2020;90:92-99.
2 Palone M, Spedicato GA, Lombardo L. Analysis of tooth anatomy in adults with ideal occlusion: A preliminary study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020;157:218-227.
3 Liu SS, Buschang PH. How does tooth eruption relate to vertical mandibular growth displacement?Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:745-51.
4 Vela-Hernández A, López-García R, García-Sanz V, Paredes-Gallardo V, Lasagabaster-Latorre F. Nonsurgical treatment of skeletal anterior open bite in adult patients: Posterior build-ups. Angle Orthod 2017;87:33-40.
5 Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972;62:296-309.
6 Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, et al. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:589–599.
Case photos provided by Dr. Riccardo Riatti.
A special thanks to Mr. Stefano Negrini (digital orthodontic technician).
Dr. Riatti received his Dental Degree from the University of Parma and his Orthodontic Degree from the University of Cagliari. Since 2008, he has been Visiting Professor at the School of Specialization in Orthodontics at the University of Trieste. He is a diplomate of the Italian Board of Orthodontics (IBO) and a diplomate of the European Board of Orthodontists (EBO). His teaching topics are esthetics, self-ligating appliances and aligners. Dr. Riatti maintain a private practice in Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Fig. 1A, Facial photos at start of treatment.
Fig. 1B, Facial photos at start of treatment.
Fig. 1C, Facial photos at start of treatment.
Fig. 1D, Facial photos at start of treatment.
Fig. 1E, Facial photos at start of treatment.
Fig. 1F, Facial photos at start of treatment.
Fig. 1G, Facial photos at start of treatment.
Fig. 1H, Facial photos at start of treatment.
Fig. 1I, Facial photos at start of treatment.
Fig. 1J, Facial photos at start of treatment.
Fig. 1K, Facial photos at start of treatment.
Fig. 1L, Facial photos at start of treatment.
Fig. 1M, Facial photos at start of treatment.
Fig. 1N, Facial photos at start of treatment.
Fig. 1O, Facial photos at start of treatment.
Fig 1, P, Additional intraoral photos at start of treatment
Fig 1, Q, Additional intraoral photos at start of treatment
Fig 1, R, Additional intraoral photos at start of treatment
Fig 1, S, Additional intraoral photos at start of treatment
Fig 1, T, Additional intraoral photos at start of treatment
Fig 1, U, Additional intraoral photos at start of treatment
Fig 2-3, Table 1, Initial panoramic and cephalometric x-ray analysis.
Fig 2-3, Table 1, Initial panoramic and cephalometric x-ray analysis.
Fig 4a, Software views of teeth, brackets, and positioning.
Fig 4B, Software views of teeth, brackets, and positioning.
Fig 4C, Software views of teeth, brackets, and positioning.
Fig 4D, Software views of teeth, brackets, and positioning.
Fig 4E, Software views of teeth, brackets, and positioning.
Fig 5A, Software views of teeth, brackets, and positioning.
Fig 5B, Software views of teeth, brackets, and positioning.
Fig 5C, Software views of teeth, brackets, and positioning.
Fig 5D, Software views of teeth, brackets, and positioning.
Fig. 6A, Digital Flash-Free Bonding lower arch.
Fig. 6B, Digital Flash-Free Bonding lower arch.
Fig. 6C, Digital Flash-Free Bonding lower arch.
Fig. 6D, Digital Flash-Free Bonding lower arch.
Fig. 6E, Digital Flash-Free Bonding lower arch.
Fig. 7A, Initial bonding intraoral photos.
Fig. 7B, Initial bonding intraoral photos.
Fig. 7C, Initial bonding intraoral photos.
Fig. 8A, Initial bonding intraoral photos.
Fig. 8B, Initial bonding intraoral photos.
Fig. 9A, Class II elastics and occlusal build-ups.
Fig. 9B, Class II elastics and occlusal build-ups.
Fig. 9C, Class II elastics and occlusal build-ups.
Fig. 9D, Class II elastics and occlusal build-ups.
Fig. 9E, Class II elastics and occlusal build-ups.
Fig. 10A Finishing.
Fig. 10B, Finishing.
Fig. 10C, Finishing.
Fig. 11A, Intercuspation and sectional 3-3 in the lower arch.
Fig. 11B, Intercuspation and sectional 3-3 in the lower arch.
Fig. 11C, Intercuspation and sectional 3-3 in the lower arch.
Fig. D, Intercuspation and sectional 3-3 in the lower arch.
Fig. D, Intercuspation and sectional 3-3 in the lower arch.
Fig. 12A, Facial photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12B, Facial photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12C, Facial photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12D, Facial photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12E, Facial photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12F, Facial photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12G, Facial photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12H, Facial photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12I, Facial photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12J, Facial photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12K, Facial photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12L, Facial photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12M, Facial photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12N, Facial photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12O, Facial photos at end of treatment.
Please provide valid UUID/Locale to performUnable to fetch content . Please contact FuzeAdmin.
Fig. 12P, Intraoral photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12Q, Intraoral photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12R, Intraoral photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12S, Intraoral photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 12T, Intraoral photos at end of treatment.
Fig. 13, Table 2, Final panoramic and cephalometric x-ray analysis.
Fig. 14, Table 2, Final panoramic and cephalometric x-ray analysis.
Fig. 15A, Final digital models.
Fig. 15B, Final digital models.
Fig. 15C, Final digital models.
Fig. 15D, Final digital models.
Fig. 15E, Final digital models.
Thank you for your subscription! Innova is a relevant and educational source for orthodontic solutions and treatment options from 3M Oral Care.
Please check your email for the most current issue of Innova.
An error has occurred while submitting. Please try again.