- Overview
- IMPROVE REVENUE CYCLE
- Clinical documentation integrity
- Coding
- Compliance and regulatory
- Patient classification methodologies
- Consulting services
- All revenue cycle solutions
- CREATE TIME TO CARE
- Clinician solutions
- CDI and care management
- Imaging solutions
- Adoption services
- Consulting services
- View all solutions
- DRIVE VALUE-BASED CARE
- Performance improvement
- Payers
- Patient classification methodologies
- Consulting services
- All value-based solutions
- RESOURCES
- Events and tradeshows
- Library
- Webinars
- Our partners
- Government and military
- Health Care Academy
- COVID-19 resources
- All resources
- Support
Data analytics: More promise than performance?
We live in an era of unprecedented data access.
But how can you leverage data to benefit your patients and populations?
Health care leaders have never had more access to data than they do today. This data can potentially provide a better understanding of their organizations and empower well-informed decisions in this new environment. But health care data is complex. When you begin to map out all the potential interconnections, it reveals a very intricate decision-making environment.
Where are the problems and opportunities?
What drives a winning strategy?
Data and analytics are the #1 concern currently facing health care executives in the United States.
(According to the Healthcare Executive Group’s 2018 “Top Ten” study.)
Most health care analytics solutions strike out.
Why? Too many solutions look backward in an industry that needs to look forward.
A strong analytics approach is essential to draw needed insights from data. But for most organizations, today’s solutions offer more promise than performance. And since the data under analysis is retrospective, the solutions offer only a look backward, not forward.
But the promise of predictive, prescriptive data—data that tells you what actions to take before you need to take them—is a grand slam.
-
Retrospective
How well has your organization performed in the past?
(Easy) -
Real time
How is your organization performing now at the point of care?
(Challenging)
-
Predictive
Who is likely to develop Disease A or progress to Disease B? Can the progression be slowed?
(Difficult) -
Prescriptive
What action plan can produce real results?
(Most difficult and beneficial)
Relying on statistical models is not enough.
Analytic solutions must be clinically credible.
-
Statistical significance ≠ Clinical significance
A strictly statistical approach to health care analytics risks identifying correlation without causation. Proven methodologies combined with clinical expertise are essential.
Pure machine-learning models are “black boxes.” The machine cannot explain how it comes to its recommendations. When pure machine models deal with human lives, mistakes may be made without explanation or intervention. Consider the self-driving car that struck and killed a pedestrian. Or the drivers of those cars who stop watching the road because they have too much faith in the vehicle’s algorithms.
A better model for health care begins with teaching the machine algorithms based on proven methodologies and then having subject matter experts review the machine output. With this approach, you can pursue opportunities consistent with your organization’s professional and ethical standards and knowledge.
While new vendors and technologies promise tremendous value, clinical expertise and experience are must-haves for creating meaningful insights.
Augment your understanding by expanding information sources. Consider how much more you can improve outcomes by integrating information from smart watches, gym participation tracking, healthy eating programs and more.
Augment your understanding by expanding information sources. Consider how much more you can improve outcomes by integrating information from smart watches, gym participation tracking, healthy eating programs and more.
Patients’ severity of illness and complications are not all alike, so account for differences when reporting benchmarks and performance rates. Opportunities lie in the gaps between the risk-adjusted, expected rate and the observed rate.
Patients’ severity of illness and complications are not all alike, so account for differences when reporting benchmarks and performance rates. Opportunities lie in the gaps between the risk-adjusted, expected rate and the observed rate.
To improve outcomes and reduce the cost of health care, healthcare professionals must change the way they work. Example: instead of counting how many people got flu shots, determine if the flu shot program reduced ED visits and hospitalizations.
To improve outcomes and reduce the cost of health care, healthcare professionals must change the way they work. Example: instead of counting how many people got flu shots, determine if the flu shot program reduced ED visits and hospitalizations.
To be clinically credible, results must be risk-adjusted using proven and transparent methodologies.
To be clinically credible, results must be risk-adjusted using proven and transparent methodologies.
Machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) require large data sets so that the machines can learn and then test algorithms. This requires the ability to combine very large data sets.
Machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) require large data sets so that the machines can learn and then test algorithms. This requires the ability to combine very large data sets.
It’s time for robust analytics to step up to the plate.
With a strong foundation, advanced technology can apply clinical methodologies at scale.
-
Natural language processing (NLP)Eighty percent of health information in medical records is unstructured notes, such as physician and nursing notes, and unusable. (Source) NLP is a technology that can read unstructured notes and turn them into structured information. NLP automates and augments the work of those spending time searching through medical records.
-
AutomationPeople trying to understand data spend considerable time thinking about and acting on hunches to determine the best way to slice and dice that data. With the advancements of information technologies, much more of this work can be automated and the information even augmented. Cutting edge technology, properly programmed and trained with clinical models, can reduce the time spent in manual search and analysis.
Give your data analysts a winning strategy.
Example: Drilling down to the root cause of a length-of-stay (LOS) issue within a theoretical health system.
The example below clearly demonstrates how improvements in efficiency can be achieved through advanced technologies. In the past, a long LOS for a particular orthopedic procedure might mean working with all of the surgeons who perform that procedure. Instead, AI can provide more specificity more quickly and identify the areas to focus on. In this example, the analysis indicates there are only two surgeons whose performance needs review.
From broad issues (difficult to address) to specific, actionable issues
-
Hospital #1 accounts for 32% of total excess LOS
-
Of that 32%, excess LOS as a result of orthopedic surgery accounts for 23%
-
Within that 23%, potentially preventable complications are 46% higher than expected
-
Of those potentially preventable complications, 68% occurred in patients with preexisting conditions
-
Of those patients, 22% were treated by “Doctor A” and “Doctor B”
How do you address persistent industry challenges with analytics?
For each challenge, there is a potential solution.
-
Challenge: No industry-standard risk-adjustment method exists
Solution: All baseline data should be risk-adjusted with a clinically defensible model
-
Challenge: True “apples-to-apples” comparison is difficult
Solution: Benchmarks and norms should be risk-adjusted with the same risk-adjustment model
-
Challenge: More time is spent researching problems instead of responding to them
Solution: Analysis should prioritize problems based on clinical and financial best practices
-
Challenge: Resolutions are made in silos and focus on short-term results
Solution: Improvement plans should address long-term, system-wide enhancements
-
Challenge: Vertical issue analysis
Solution: Analysis should evaluate interdependent issues
-
Challenge: Incorrect problem attribution
Solution: Causal attribution should be correctly identified at a granular level
3M and Verily are beginning to show the transformative value of new analytics technology.
-
Health care organizations are all pulled in too many directions. The analytic solutions that will win in today’s market should serve up the information you need for detailed, data-driven decision making. Deploying resources to specific, actionable, risk-adjusted opportunities provides a better chance of improving performance and outcomes. This is what brought 3M Health Information Systems and Verily Life Sciences together to develop the 3M™ Performance Matrix Platform.
The 3M Performance Matrix is a performance analytics solution that identifies, quantifies and prioritizes a health system’s most pressing issues to help providers convert challenges to opportunities.
Together with Verily, 3M Health Information Systems analyzed Medicare data from hundreds of health systems with the 3M Performance Matrix. From a sample of just 10 of those health systems, we discovered over $1 billion in cost-saving opportunities.
The statistics speak for themselves.
Take the next step on your journey
Let's see how we can work together to optimize your organization today!
Connect with us
Discover the inspiration and information you’re looking for on the health care topics that matter most.
-
Read blog posts from 3M industry experts.Inside AngleSubscribe to our blogStay current on industry challenges and get expert advice.WebinarsView upcoming and archived webinarsShare ideas and connect with others in the industry.Join the conversationFollow us on LinkedInIn-depth conversations on leading industry issues.Inside Angle podcast
-
3M is a trademark of 3M Company. Verily is a trademark of Verily Life Sciences LLC.
