3M™ Patient-focused Episodes (PFE) Software

3M PFEs are most attractive to organizations interested in improving systemwide healthcare performance, provider profiling and payment reform. Examples include payers, large integrated delivery systems, accountable care organizations, risk-bearing provider organizations, government agencies, employers and research groups.

3M PFEs are designed both for analysis and for creating a bundled, incentive-based payment method. Because the 3M PFE-based payment method includes risk adjustment, it can reward provider collaboration and efficiency without requiring providers to accept insurance risk for the incidence of illness and injury. Many payers, led by Medicare, look to episodes and other alternative payment methods to reduce waste, increase coordination and improve outcomes.

Here are a few examples of the value 3M PFEs can bring to customers:
 

• Meaningful communication to improve patient outcomes. To improve care, clinicians need data they can believe. 3M PFEs are defined in clinical terms that communicate actionable information at a sufficient level of detail. High-level analysis reveals variations and areas for potential improvement, so that the categorical nature of 3M PFE results can then lead to focused actions.
• Bundled payment. The 3M PFE patient-centered approach greatly simplifies the administration of an episode-based payment method. It eliminates the complexity of defining which services are related to which diagnoses. This is especially important when patients have multiple diagnoses. The entity receiving the single payment is rewarded for efficiently coordinating both acute and post-acute care across multiple provider types. 3M PFEs include severity and risk adjustment, available empirically defined relative payment weights and other features needed for a successful prospective payment system.
• Stewardship of financial resources. 3M PFEs clearly define the episode as the comprehensive unit of service. The ability to compare actual and expected resource use can help identify patterns of systematic overuse and underuse. These results serve as a starting place for further identification of possible inappropriate care, fraud, waste and abuse. For example, if a hospital’s patients have meaningfully higher post-acute care expenses compared with peer organizations, the reason may be inadequacies in inpatient care or continuity of care.

3M PFEs are available in the following Solventum products:
 

• 3M™ Core Grouping Software (CGS)
• 3M™ Grouper Plus Content Services (GPCS)
• 3M™ Data-to-Action Solution
• 3M™ Intelligent Data Asset

Available to licensees on the Solventum customer support website:
 

• 3M PFE Methodology Overview
• 3M PFE Definitions Manual
• 3M PFE Summary of Changes
• 3M PFE Setup Guides

Solventum experts are available to advise health plans, government agencies, providers and other organizations on how to obtain maximum value from the 3M PFEs.

Solventum consultants can also help payers and other organizations measure performance and identify material variation across health plans, providers and other patient populations; design pay-for-outcomes incentive methods; facilitate learning collaboratives; and provide advice on documentation and coding.

All data required to assign a 3M PFE are routinely collected from institutional and professional claims, including the UB-04 and CMS-1500 paper forms and their corresponding X12N 837 electronic formats. Pharmacy data in NCPDP format are optional but recommended.  Consistent, unique patient identifiers are essential. These requirements are the same as those for the 3M CRGs.

3M PFE analysis typically involves creation of a static data set comprising at least one full year of data. Two years of data allow a full year of data to establish baseline health status by 3M CRG before a one-year episode analysis window. Some users perform rolling analyses each month or each quarter. The 3M PFEs do not need to be built into a claim-processing system.

Development

In the 1980s and 1990s, the success of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) diagnosis related groups (DRGs) for hospital inpatient care prompted widespread interest in developing similar models for other applications. Since CMS DRGs define an episode as a single hospital stay, the obvious extension was to define broader episodes. For example, an episode might also include the cost of physician services and post-acute services such as rehabilitation.

Solventum, as the contractor to CMS for Medicare DRGs, was well-positioned to develop such models. Under contract to CMS and the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), Solventum prepared analyses of episodes built around Medicare DRGs that were published in 2013 in the Medicare and Medicaid Research Review¹ and in a MedPAC Report to Congress.²

In parallel to its work developing episodes around Medicare DRGs, Solventum also developed the more comprehensive, proprietary 3M PFEs. 3M PFEs are appropriate for all populations, include both inpatient and ambulatory care and incorporate risk adjustment for baseline health status.

Design principles

These four principles guide the 3M PFE design:
 

1. Patient-focused. Most notably, the episode clinical model focuses on an individual’s total burden of illness. This approach differs from conventional disease-centered models that face the intractable challenge of separating services; for example, heart failure requires treatment and services distinct from those needed for lung disease. This is important because patients with interacting comorbidities are precisely those who are most expensive to care for and the most complex clinically.
2. Uniform categorical clinical model. 3M PFEs are a categorical clinical model, that is, a mutually exclusive and exhaustive set of clinical categories that differentiate individuals based on their total burden of illness. The underlying categorical model applies to all episode types, creating a uniform and stable clinical language. The model also remains unchanged across all potential configurations of episodes (window lengths, included services, etc.).
3. Re-use well-established systems. 3M PFEs are based on 3M APR DRGs, 3M EAPGs and 3M CRGs, which are widely used for risk adjustment and payment systems.
4. Independent, empirically derived relative weights. For each potential configuration of episodes used, a separate set of relative weights should be computed. Despite differences in configuration, relative weights reflect a stable clinical model, enabling a consistent clinical language.

Structure

For profiling comparisons or establishing payment levels, users of an episode methodology must calculate both actual and expected resource use by episode. In setting up a 3M PFE analysis, users have broad flexibility in defining the time windows for episode identification and the 3M CRG assignment, determining which services are included and excluded and defining the readmission logic.

3M PFE software performs two basic functions:
 

1. Episode classification: Based on the patient’s claims history, each patient is assigned to event-based and/or cohort-based episodes. Event-based episodes start when a significant health care event occurs; a patient may be in only one event-based episode at a time. Cohort episodes are assigned to patients who share a common disease, condition or characteristic within a given time period. A patient may be in more than one cohort episode at the same time. Neither episode type attempts to isolate the services associated with any specific condition, but instead capture the patient’s entire resource needs during the episode. The patient’s baseline health status can be considered using the patient’s Clinical Risk Group (CRG) or Aggregated CRG.
2. Episode accumulator: Based on the time window selected and the service categories included, actual expenditures are accumulated for each episode.

The actual expenditures that output from the accumulator can be used to compare against expected expenditures derived from relative weights.

The 3M PFE clinical logic is maintained by a team of clinicians, data analysts, clinical analysts, programmers and economists. The logic is proprietary to Solventum but is available for licensees to view in the online 3M PFE definitions manual. The methodology is updated annually to reflect changes in the standard diagnosis and procedure code sets and is regularly enhanced to improve the clinical logic.

Examples of 3M PFEs

Event-based episodes:
 

• Inpatient Surgical Event (n = 51)
  1001710 Permanent Cardiac Pacemaker Implant without AMI, Heart Failure or Shock
• Inpatient Medical Event (n = 49)
  2001340 Pulmonary Embolism
• Outpatient Procedure Event (n = 135)
  3000360 Level II Foot Procedures
• Outpatient Medical Event (n = 11)
  4004980 Kidney Infections

Cohort episodes:
 

• Chronic Cohort (n = 96)
  6000020 Parkinson’s Disease
• Acute Cohort (n = 25)
  5000420 Cerebrovascular Infarction
• Pregnancy Cohort (n = 6)
  8005401 High Risk Pregnancy w Delivery
• Population Cohort (n = 1)
  7000000 Population

¹Vertrees J, Averill R, Eisenhandler, J, Quain, A, Switalski J. Bundling Post-Acute Care Services into MS-DRG Payments. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013;3(3):E1-E19
²Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Approaches to bundling payment for post-acute care. Chapter 3 in Report to the Congress: Medicare and the Health Care System. Washington, DC: MedPAC, June 2013.